Discover the essentials of formal vs. informal meetings, their uses, and tips for success in our latest post.
Meetings are a common part of the workday, providing a chance for teams to align, make decisions, and move projects forward. However, not all meetings are created equal. There are key differences between formal and informal meetings.
Formal meetings tend to be more structured, with set agendas, schedules, and procedures. They often cover critical business matters and include decision makers. Informal meetings are more casual, with flexibility in timing and topics covered. They may serve as brainstorming sessions or project updates among a subset of the team.
In this article, we'll explore the core differences between formal and informal meetings in terms of purpose, attendees, structure, outcomes, frequency, location, and key takeaways. Understanding these distinctions can help managers determine when to call a formal all-hands meeting versus gathering informally with just a few team members. It comes down to matching the meeting style to the goals and participants.
Formal meetings have a focused, predefined purpose. They are scheduled in advance with a clear agenda outlined. The goal of a formal meeting is to accomplish a specific task or make a decision.
Informal meetings are more ad-hoc. There may not be a set agenda or objectives going into an informal meeting. The purpose is more open-ended, allowing attendees to bring up any topics or hold a free-flowing discussion. Informal meetings provide a space for collaboration, brainstorming, and sharing information in a casual setting. The conversations that occur organically can spark new ideas or uncover issues. While no firm decisions may be made, the insights gained from informal meetings still have value.
Formal meetings typically have a clearly defined agenda that is set ahead of time and shared with all participants. The agenda outlines the topics to be discussed, the order they will be covered, and the allocated time for each item. Having an agenda keeps the meeting focused and on track, while ensuring key issues are addressed. It also allows attendees to prepare in advance.
In contrast, informal meetings usually do not have a fixed agenda. The discussion is more free-flowing and topics arise spontaneously based on participants' interests. While this allows for flexibility, it can also result in important topics being overlooked or conversations going off on tangents. Without a set structure, informal meetings may be less efficient at making decisions or resolving issues. The lack of agenda means attendees cannot prepare properly beforehand.
Formal meetings typically have a defined attendee list, with required stakeholders present based on the meeting agenda and goals. For example, a project status update meeting would include the project manager, key team members, and potentially cross-functional partners. The attendee list is carefully curated to ensure the right people are in the room.
In contrast, informal meetings can have a more ad-hoc attendee list. These meetings may occur more spur of the moment, with availability determining who can join. The flexible nature of informal meetings allows for a more open door policy on attendees. While having the right people present is still ideal, informal meetings provide more leeway on who needs to be there. Overall, formal meetings require more purposeful attendee selection, while informal meetings are more flexible.
Formal meetings generally have a high degree of structure and formality. There are established rules, procedures, and protocols that govern the proceedings. For example, there may be a clear agenda that is set ahead of time and strictly followed. There is often a designated chair or facilitator who is in charge of guiding the discussion and keeping things on track. Formal meetings usually follow Robert's Rules of Order or other parliamentary procedures for how motions are made and votes are taken.
In contrast, informal meetings tend to have a much looser structure with fewer rules. There may not be a set agenda, allowing the conversation to flow more organically. Attendees can jump in when they have something to contribute rather than waiting to be recognized by a chairperson. Discussions often feel more casual and conversational. The atmosphere is typically more relaxed in an informal meeting compared to the orderly, regulated environment of a formal one. While informal meetings provide more flexibility, formal meetings ensure efficient use of time and equitable participation with established procedures. The level of structure should match the purpose and goals of the meeting.
Formal meetings usually have clearly defined goals and outcomes that are determined beforehand. The agenda outlines specific topics to cover and decisions to be made. Formal meetings result in concrete next steps, action items, and deliverables.
Participants come prepared to contribute to achieving the predetermined outcomes. There is an expectation that progress will be made on key objectives. Formal meetings drive projects and initiatives forward.
In contrast, informal meetings may have vague or undefined goals. The discussion is more free-flowing and participants aren't necessarily aligned on the purpose. Informal meetings are more exploratory in nature, allowing for brainstorming and exchange of ideas. The outcomes tend to be less structured without firm commitments, plans or accountability.
While less progress may be made in informal meetings, they provide opportunity for discovery, relationship building and generating new concepts. The loose format sparks creativity and unfiltered thinking.
Formal meetings tend to occur on a regular schedule, like weekly, monthly, quarterly, or annually. They are planned well in advance and put on calendars. Informal meetings are more ad-hoc and can happen spontaneously as needed.
While formal meetings have a set cadence, informal meetings may only occur once if they are to address a specific issue or make a one-time decision. Informal meetings provide flexibility to bring people together to collaborate or make a decision in the moment, without waiting for the next scheduled formal meeting.
Formal meetings require more rigid scheduling and coordination, while informal meetings can happen organically. Both have their place in an organization. Formal meetings ensure regular status updates, planning, and alignment. Informal meetings enable quick syncs, spur of the moment brainstorming, and nimble decision making. Understanding the differences in frequency and cadence is key.
Formal meetings are typically held in conference rooms, meeting rooms, or other designated spaces that are set aside specifically for hosting meetings. These locations help create a professional atmosphere and minimize distractions. Having a room reserved ahead of time also signals to attendees that this is an important, planned event that merits their full attention. The setting implies a certain structure and formality.
Informal meetings can take place almost anywhere - coffee shops, restaurants, lounges, parks, or impromptu gatherings in someone's office. Not having a dedicated meeting space allows a more casual, relaxed vibe. However, the lack of a quiet, private room also means there may be more distractions and interruptions. While convenient, informal gathering spots don't always foster productive work sessions.
Formal and informal meetings each have their place in an organization. The key differences between formal and informal meetings include:
Formal Meetings
Learn How you can record, transcribe and generate meeting minutes with Glyph AI.
Read about 6 types of team meetings you need (and 3 you don’t)
Informal Meetings
The structure and outcomes of each meeting type provide different benefits. Formal meetings bring order and efficiency to make decisions. Informal meetings allow creative thinking and relationship building. Organizations need both meeting formats to align people around priorities while also enabling innovation. Thoughtfully choosing between formal and informal meetings, and using the appropriate structure for each, leads to more productive and satisfying meetings overall.
Both formal and informal meetings serve important purposes in the workplace. The key is choosing the right approach for each situation.
Formal meetings work well when you need to make decisions, solve problems, or align teams. Come prepared with a clear agenda, desired outcomes, and all the right stakeholders at the table. Follow through on action items after the meeting.
Informal meetings allow for more free-flowing conversation and collaboration. Use them to brainstorm ideas, provide status updates, and strengthen connections. While you don't need a strict agenda, still have a purpose in mind.
The most effective organizations use a mix of formal and informal meetings. Gauge which format best fits your objectives and team culture. Also consider alternatives like email, instant messaging, and collaboration platforms depending on the circumstances.
With thoughtfulness and intention, meetings can move projects forward, enable innovations, and bring teams together. Choose the approach that makes the most of everyone's time and energy.
.png)
Save thousands of hours with Glyph: transcribe, summarize, and extract key info from conversations, meetings, interviews, and research for faster decisions
.png)
